The Financial Action Task Force, FATF Travel Rule—formally known as Recommendation 16—requires financial institutions to share specific transaction information to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Initially designed for traditional banks, the rule was extended in 2019 to include Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), such as cryptocurrency exchanges. However, implementation has been inconsistent and fraught with challenges across jurisdictions.
One of the major obstacles is the lack of uniformity in enforcement. Countries have adopted the Travel Rule at different speeds and with varying thresholds. For instance, Switzerland mandates compliance for all transactions, regardless of value, while other countries impose higher thresholds. This regulatory disparity creates significant gaps in global compliance and complicates international crypto operations.
Technical interoperability is another critical issue. Different platforms use varying compliance protocols, making it difficult to share and verify transaction data seamlessly. In the absence of a standardized global framework, ensuring accurate information exchange between parties becomes inefficient and unreliable.
Also read: Fugitive Mehul Choksi caught in Belgium, Government confirms
High compliance costs further compound the problem. Small and mid-sized VASPs often lack the resources to adopt advanced compliance systems, unlike larger firms that can afford robust infrastructure. This puts smaller players at a disadvantage, increasing their risk of regulatory action or exclusion from the global financial ecosystem.
Additionally, the rise of proprietary compliance systems developed by leading global firms has raised concerns about monopolization. These closed-loop solutions are frequently incompatible with other systems and could concentrate compliance control among a few dominant players. For Indian companies, this would mean not only higher costs but also increased dependence on foreign technologies—raising long-standing concerns about data sovereignty and market autonomy.
India must adopt a self-reliant approach to Travel Rule implementation. Instead of relying on foreign compliance solutions, the country should leverage its existing Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)—including platforms like the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Aadhaar-based eKYC—to develop an indigenous, scalable compliance framework.
By integrating these systems with compliance tools, India can create a cost-effective and transparent solution that meets international standards while safeguarding national interests. Such an approach would reduce external dependencies, enhance data security, and ensure financial sovereignty.
Furthermore, a domestic solution could serve as a model for other developing regions—particularly in Africa and Southeast Asia—where FATF scrutiny is increasing. By doing so, India has the opportunity to not only strengthen its crypto ecosystem but also emerge as a leader in the global regulatory landscape.
